🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, however, could coincide so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Strongman

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show released last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” the nation from chaos. While he is called a different name, the implication is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions often end up buttressing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with him to take the job. The presidency was in essence a selection process with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who expected to run the state in practice.

• His list included several politicians, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched his rise, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A property developer familiar with the process stated the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as James Bond. His harder version led local outlets and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. His influence is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.