🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing number of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". The policy may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for minors unless parental consent is given. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," stated one parliamentarian behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive data".

Previously, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government committed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level amid national stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring guardian approval for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various figures to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

As this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.