🔗 Share this article

During last year's presidential campaign, the former president courted voters with promises to lower prices immediately upon taking office. However, after he assumed office, he seemed to pay precious little attention to the cost of living. All that changed after price-fatigued voters expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Within days, the Trump administration initiated a hastily assembled effort to address living costs. Regrettably, this initiative has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with absurdity, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.

Detached Assertions and Supermarket Truth

Merely 48 hours after the election, Trump began his cost-reduction push with a poorly received statement: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from the wealthy leader—often associates with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated a lack of empathy for millions of Americans who struggle every time they go supermarkets. In effect, he ignored their concerns as trivial, implying they had it wrong about price levels.

This statement that everything was “way down” was highly misleading and dishonest. In what way could all costs be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were pushing up costs? Recent data indicate the cost of bananas rose 6.9% over the past year, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped 18.9%—in part because of punitive tariffs on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, costs increased in the majority of food categories tracked by the government’s price index, including meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), drinks (up 2.8%), and produce (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Statements

Despite these numbers, Trump continues to push his big lie about lower costs. After the vote, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements contradict the reality that general costs have unarguably risen since Biden left office. At present, inflation is at a 3 percent per year, that’s half again as much than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. Adding to the inaccuracies, he claimed that gas prices had fallen to around two dollars, despite government figures show they are $3.19.

Confronted by reality and lower approval ratings, some Trump aides apparently cautioned that his “prices are down” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from typical Americans. Many voters are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following assurances of reductions. In response, advisers proposed one quick fix: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs would not increase costs for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Impact

As some tariffs being rolled back on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, the administration will likely announce that he has lowered costs once those foods begin to fall in price. That would be like an arsonist boasting for putting out a blaze that he ignited. On another occasion, while speaking McDonald’s executives, Trump declared that “we are in the golden age of America” and told listeners that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to millions of Americans who are struggling—especially when many face cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

Per a survey conducted last fall, three-quarters of respondents believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them positive. A separate survey showed that 61% of Americans say Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Truth and Suggested Steps

The treasury secretary, the president’s top economic official, lately disputed assertions of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the US economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and lost around 33,000 jobs since January. Citing these challenges, Bessent urged the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—a move that could help affordability.

Reacting to widespread concern about living costs, Trump suggested a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” For many struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that Congress—already alarmed about huge budget deficits—will enact the proposal. The scheme would likely increase federal spending, push up borrowing costs, and potentially drive prices higher by putting more money into the economy.

Another supposed fix for cost issues involved introducing 50-year mortgages, with the notion that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, reality is that 50-year mortgages would do little to lower monthly payments—often reducing them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these loans could more than double the total interest borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Past Government and Economic Outlook

In their cost-cutting effort, the administration have once more pointed fingers at the previous president for economic problems, including increasing costs. Spokespeople stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” These are unfounded and untruthful claims. In reality, Biden handed over a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and unemployment low. But, the current administration’s actions—especially import taxes—have created an difficult situation, driving costs higher and slowing GDP growth.

Per Mark Zandi, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He worries that if key regions like California and New York tumble into recession, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers generally possess reduced funds to spend, and inflation usually declines. Sadly, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed cost initiative probably ineffective to control costs, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might prove to be pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that struggling Americans really can’t afford.